Unless my memory fails me, the Flag Code used to read that old flags should be disposed of preferably by burning in private.
Allen is correct. The original version of the "Flag Code," as adopted by the National Flag Conference in 1923, said:
"When the Flag is in such a condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display it should not be cast aside or used in any way that might be viewed as disrespectful to the national colors, but should be destroyed as a whole, privately, preferably by burning or by some other method in harmony with the reverence and respect we owe to the emblem representing our country."
I don't know offhand when it was changed to the current language, but it might have been when Congress officially adopted the code in 1942. The private aspect of flag disposal is still reflected in military regulations. For example, Army Regulation 840-10 says:
"If the unserviceable flag has historic value, a tag containing the historical information should be attached to the flag, and it should be kept as a memento of service by the unit or office to which it belongs. If there is no historic value, it should be destroyed privately, preferably by burning, shredding or some other method that does not show irreverence or disrespect to the flag."
Similarly, the Marine Corps Flag Manual says:
"Flags determined not to have historical value will be destroyed by the parent organization, privately by burning, with no suggestion of irreverence to its military or national significance, unless its retention as a display memento is desired by the organization."
The present practice of public ceremonies, complete with taps, prayers and speeches, often followed by chopping up the flag before burning it, is grotesque.
Personally, I agree. As I've said elsewhere here, I think that the ceremonial emphasis should be on raising a new flag, not ritually destroying an old one.
Peter Ansoff